Was Yeshua a Vegan?

06 Dec

ethompson Animal Rights, Blog 99 3

The Golden Age

Poets such as Milton and Ovid describe the Golden Age as a period of innocence when man abstained from the flesh of the creatures and was “contented with the food that Nature freely gave, men were happy in the fruit of trees, and herbs of earth, nor stained their lips with blood.”

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that something has gone horribly wrong with reality….and we now exist in a brutal, sacrificial world where evil plays the major role.

So what happened to us?

Two Creation stories

In Genesis there are two creation stories. In the first account we read: Gen1:29 “And God said, behold, I have given you every herb yielding seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree in which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed: to you it shall be for meat: and to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to everything that creepeth upon the earth wherein there is a living soul, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so. And God saw everything he had made, and behold it was very good.”

Vegan world

What is being described here in Gen 1:29 is a vegan world…it is our Source field, the holy mountain of the prophet Isaiah – and the original estate of all soul imbued beings.

“And a serpent came into the garden.”

In the second creation story we read: Gen 1x: 2-3, “And the fear of you and the dread of you shall be on every beast of the earth, and every foul of the air: with all wherewith the ground teemeth, and all the fishes of the sea, into your hand are they delivered. Every moving thing that liveth shall be food for you; as the green herb have I given you all.”

From living on the fruits and nuts of true creation, man suddenly became a carnivorous, violent, flesh eating ghoul. Man’s shift from the angelic to the demonic is called the Fall(See my article Pandora’s Box.)

Religious justification for murdering the creatures

The doctrine of the Christian Church is based on a lie…..and that lie is that animals do not have souls… at the Synod of Macon (585 AD) the Church even debated whether or not women had souls….

In the last two thousand years, the Roman Church and its tentacles of cult and creed have spread all across the world preaching their gospel of division and oppression: my god is better than your god, that women should be chattels and subservient to their husbands – and that animals have no souls.

Here’s a quote from the Catholic apologist Joseph Rickaby:

“The brutes are not created by God. They have no rights. The brutes are made for man, who has the same right over them as he has over plants and stones. He may kill them for food and inflict pain on them for any good or reasonable end, such as the promotion of man’s knowledge, health or even the purpose of recreation. There is no shadow of evil resting on the practice of causing pain to brutes in sport, where the pain is not in the sport itself, but an incidental concomitant of it. Much more in all that condones to the sustenance of man may we give pain to brutes as also in the pursuit of Science. Nor are we bound to any anxious care to make this pain as little as may be. Brutes are things in our regard.” Catholic Dictionary 1897 in an article called Lower Animals.

The above quotation is an example of the spiritual rot that calls itself the ‘Christian World.’ The blatant lie that animals have no souls has become the ‘sanctioned’ justification for the barbarous cruelties that were not only inflicted upon the creatures but upon indigenous peoples… who were also regarded as soulless animals to be hunted, maimed and killed.

Here are the words of Col. John Milton Chivington, a Methodist missionary and priest on the eve of the massacre of Arapaho Indians at Sand Creek:

“Damn any man who sympathizes with Indians! I have come to kill Indians, and believe it is right and honorable to use any means under God’s heaven to kill Indians…Kill, scalp all, big and little; nits make lice.”

Silent testimony

The New Testament is quiet on the subject of cruelty to animals, and I’ve often wondered why Yeshua never taught the spiritual importance of being kind to the creatures …I find it strange that a fundamental of compassion is missing from the texts? Perhaps the teachings of the Master were removed.

Paul – the usurper of the Master’s message

“There has really never been a more monstrous imposition than the imposition of the limitation of Paul’s soul upon the soul of Yeshua.” George Bernard Shaw.

The Church does not preach the message of Yeshua…. though that is its pretense. Instead it preaches the doctrines of Saul/Paul the self-proclaimed ‘Apostle of the Master’. Paul didn’t arrive on the scene until after the resurrection and was instantly at odds with the rules set down by Yeshua and James, especially when it came to the treatment of animals and the humane diet.

Paul had an unpleasant contempt for animals, and this can be seen in his sarcastic remark to the edict in Deuteronomy xxv v4: “Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox when he treadeth the corn,” with the callous inquiry: “Doth God care for oxen?”

In Philippians 111 v2, he uses the word dog as a term of contempt.

In Romans xiv: 1-2 , Paul really shows his disdain for those who carried their kindness to animals to its logical conclusion… with the words: “Accept him whose faith is weak, without passing judgment on disputable matters. One man’s faith allows him to eat everything, but another man, whose faith is weak, eats only vegetables. The man who eats everything must not look down on him who does not, and the man who does not eat everything must not condemn the man who does, for God’s has accepted him.”

In contrast to Paul’s outburst, we read the following in the Book of Daniel.

Then said Daniel to the steward whom the prince of all the eunuchs had appointed over Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael and Azariah, “prove thy servants, I beseech thee, ten days; and let them give us pulse(herbs) to eat and water to drink.”…So the steward harkened unto them in this matter, and proved them ten days. At the end of the ten days their countenances appeared fairer, and they were fatter in the flesh, than all the youths which did eat of the king’s meat.

Furthermore, modern science accurately demonstrates, time and time again, the nutritional superiority of the vegan diet….the diet that God ordained in Gen 1:29.

Convert or pervert

“It is from the Bible that man has learned cruelty, rapine and murder; for the belief of a cruel God makes a cruel man.” Thomas Paine – The Age of Reason.

What can be said of Paul who oversaw the killing of the Master’s disciples and held sway over the stoning of Stephen? Acts: 7:58. – and who blocked any humanitarian attempts to stop the appalling, and lucrative ‘priestly’ business of trafficking doves and animals for sacrifice in the Temple. Paul we are told was suddenly converted to the teachings of Yeshua but instead of being a true follower of the Master, he committed greater acts of devilry and deception. He usurped the teachings of Yeshua, argued with his apostles, took over his Church and taught a fear based anti-life agenda.

The Church of Paul

It is clear from Paul’s disparaging attacks on those who abstained from dead flesh that there was a great deal of opposition to his views from the true followers of the Master. The extent to which Paul’s influence has superseded that of Christ and the apostles may be seen from the fact that in the New Testament there are no less than thirteen epistles attributed to Paul. Acts is practically the life of Paul – and his teachings portrayed as if he were the Master.

Paul became the first and foremost theologian of the Church and has remained so ever since. Yet the astonishing fact is that Paul never met Yeshua, and what he knew of the Master’s teachings must have been received from the very apostles whose authority and interpretations he disputed. Any person who thinks that Source or true Creator intended Paul’s influence to override that of Peter and John are accusing Yeshua of choosing the wrong disciples. Peter and John were the Master’s most intimate disciples and were relegated to bystander status by the dominating figure of Paul, who calmly says that he is no way inferior to them and has done more for the cause of Christ than any of them. Mark 1v: 34.

Paul, and later the Nicean Council of sun worshippers imposed their will upon the scriptures – they dictated what was written in the texts, distorted or left out the Master’s teachings to fulfil their Luciferian agenda – that was, and is, designed to deceive and spiritually emasculate the masses.

The quiet voice

And so, the quiet and compassionate voice of Yeshua was expunged from the scriptures; drowned out by the roaring, self-righteous ego of Paul…the Luciferian AI whose barbaric teachings turned a pro-life religion into a slaughter house.